The National Organization for Science, Humanity, Information and Technology report 273.05.7, 20-06-2018
The National Organization for Science, Humanity, Information and Technology has released its most recent study on education, several other social behavioral factors, and their corresponding affect on voting preferences.
To complete this study, a random sampling of 75,000 people was taken from a control group consisting of 125,000 participants. The study required 18 months to complete and each participant answered a 26-page questionnaire, which was divided into 7 distinct investigative areas, or chapters. These areas of investigation were: level of formal education, geographic living environments, philosophical profiles, psychological profiles, religious beliefs and practices, sexual habits and preferences, and voting behavior.
The final report and white paper (Library of Congress # 18-7655092), available from the organization’s website, outlines an incredibly wide range of findings, which go well beyond mere correlation, and can only be explained as distinct characteristic properties of varying populations within the larger social construct.
Some of the more interesting findings were:
Those people who voted in a more progressive manner, as distinct from those who portray themselves as merely in the ‘liberal’ voting bloc, were overwhelmingly more educated, possessed a well balanced and egalitarian philosophical view of the world, were psychologically more stable, and possessed sexual norms which remain almost exclusively within the parameters of normal behavior and desires.
Conversely, among those people who voted in a more conservative manner, the study showed that those who identified themselves as ‘traditional’ republicans also possessed a level of education slightly above the mean value of the larger control group, and possessed a well considered philosophical view of the world. However, this group also was more likely to suffer with issues on the peripheral margins of psychological disorders. Chief among these were mild forms of bi-polar disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. This group also, like those identified in the progressive voting bloc, seem to possess sexual desires and behavior within socially acceptable norms, with only a 20% increase in a desire to experience what are identified as sexual taboos.
This desire to explore and experience sexual taboos was present with a heightened feeling of fear of rejection by close friends if these desires were ever expressed through actions, which the researchers believe may account for the rise in psychological disorders among this group.
Within the bloc that consider themselves to be ‘conservative,’ but not what is generally accepted as ‘traditional republican’ voter, the findings of the study were quite stark and revealing. This group was distinguished in the study though a series of questions regarding conservative fiscal policy, foreign policy, domestic social policy, and religious belief structures. No fewer than 15 questions were specifically structured to indicate an individual’s support for the current president.
This group had a staggering 98% positive attitude toward the current administration even though unrelated questions about tax issues (including wealth distribution inequities), education policy, and health care among others, showed a distinctly high level of disapproval with current initiatives. These questions were placed within the study twice; once with wording completely unrelated to the persona of the president, and the second time reworded so that the initiative was expressed as an invention or policy of Mr. Trump. This was especially true in questions about racial policy and equality, immigration policy, and global trade policy.
In an overall setting, the larger stream of data sets revealed the following: Respondents who identified themselves as conservative, but almost solely in relation to their attachment to Mr. Trump, and not based upon any consistent support for the traditionally conservative polices mentioned above, conformed to the following set of characteristics. These people were 75% more likely than other groups to have no college education. Of this group, 98% of them indicated no interest in ever attending college, and actually exhibited a fear and/or skepticism toward even the most basic post-secondary education. Still within this group, 65% of them received a high school diploma, but more than half of these respondents, 58.7%, received a Graduation Equivalency Diploma (GED) from their State Board of Education.
Further, almost 99% of this group was not in possession of any holistic philosophical view of mankind and the world in general. They were 77% more likely to identify themselves as religious conservatives, indicating a belief that A) the entire bible is the word of God, and B) that there is no error within the bible itself. This is in stark contrast to almost all other groups within the study. Even those within other identified groups who also identified themselves as religious conservatives, indicated a belief in the value of varying interpretations of scripture.
Regarding other areas of identified behaviors in the study, this group was 83% more likely than all other identified groups to suffer serious psychological maladies, which are, for the most part, untreated except through opioid-based medication. Drug and alcohol abuse among this group, though elevated to some extent in most other groups, is rampant, with meth-amphetamines, being the primary drug of choice.
Lastly, the group that self-identified, above all other variants, as Trump supporters first and foremost, were 99% more likely than all other groups to prefer sexual relations with animals, rather than other humans. Farm animals were preferred, but those who live in an urban or suburban environment seemed quite happy with any neighborhood dogs, or cats they can lure behind their trailer. But who needs a study to figure that out.
Predictably, 100% of all respondents identified in all other groups agree that they would prefer if the trump supporters went ahead and just had sex with animals. The rest of humanity doesn’t really want them to reproduce.